Friday, September 30, 2016

Did the previous owners know about the fire damage?

Question: Long story short, I came home from vacation to major water damage in my home. It seems that my second-floor toilet tank cracked and water ran for almost a week.
When the demolition crew was taking out walls they discovered that there was a fire in our home, at one time. We have lived in our home since 1992 and during the selling process there was no mention of there being a fire in the house. There needs to be some insulation and drywall work that is not covered under the water damage.
The previous owner of this house was the real estate agent. Do we have any recourse in this situation?

Answer: The first questions an attorney for the former owners would probably ask would go like this: You have lived in this house for 15 years. How does anyone know that you did not have a fire at some point in your residency and that in making repairs you did not include insulation?
How do you know the agent-owner was responsible? Did anyone else own the property? Could the fire have occurred while the home was under construction? Do you know for a fact that there was insulation in place when the property was originally built? What if the broker hired a contractor to do repair work after the fire and the contractor -- without the owner's knowledge -- did not install the insulation? How many of us, after all, break down walls to look for insulation?
What, exactly, are the damages here? Were your heating and air conditioning bills higher than they should have been? How much higher?
What were the disclosure requirements in your state 15 years ago?

Given the time, cost and irritation of a lawsuit, why not just fix the damage and be grateful that much of the cost for a better wall is covered by insurance.

Monday, September 19, 2016

Problem with my Contract to Buy a Home

Question: I'm trying to buy a home for the first time, did the usual contract, had the inspection done and found out the roof had four layers of shingles. The inspection report came out and stated the roof was not leaking, but structurally it was dangerous.
The sellers came back and said they will fix the roof, but increase the price of the house. That was a verbal, and we stated no because we did not expect to pay more for the house. To make a long story short, the sellers are two attorneys and they are now threatening us with legal action because they said nothing is wrong with the roof and they agreed to fix it anyway.

Answer: You need to get your own attorney and have him or her look at the purchase agreement and all disclosure statements. Most likely the building code requires that no more than two layers of roofing material can be used. The reason for this is to limit weight on the roof.  Too much weight could cause structural problems.

As to the seller's offer, it's a counter offer to fix the roof at your cost in the form of a higher price to which you have not agreed. What, exactly, is attractive about that?